Last year (2000) when I saw that the rear ejection Estes Sizzler was going out of production, I rushed out to my local hobby shop to pick up one of the few remaining kits. I liked the look of this kit, but was told by Bradley that it was way too heavy to give decent performance on 18mm motor. I determined from the start that I would build it to accommodate 24mm motors. I had just gotten back into rocketry at that point, and had not yet developed a taste for mid-power motors, but when I finalized plans to go to the G. Harry Stine Launch in October. I decided to go all out.

Here are all the parts. The G55 motor takes up a
considerable percentage of the volume


I modified my plans to allow the motor pod to accept the long (and expensive) G55-10 motor; also I added an interchangeable counter weight so that rocket weight could be optimized depending on the engine I used.
Roc-Sim predicted a maximum velocity of a Mach .9 and altitude of over 3900 feet. This drove some other modifications. I was concerned about the structural integrity of an Estes kit entering transonic flight. So replaced the balsa fins with aircraft plywood. The construction of the stock Sizzler was already pretty beefy, since there was an extra inner tube that went through most of the body, which gave a lot of extra strength to the body tube. I enhanced this by adding balsa stringers between this inner tube and the fuselage. I added an extra tube up front to stiffen the forward section and provide a home for the interchangeable counter weight. Finally, I wicked in as much CA as the tubes would hold, then went over the exterior with thinned epoxy

At 3900’ apogee, I was worried about recovery. I was also concerned that the long motor pod would build up too much momentum as it exited the tube. So instead of a parachute, I opted for streamers. I attached two ten foot Loc Precision orange streamers to the motor tube. The motor tube was attached to the rocket via a 6 foot, 1000 LB test kevlar cord. The cord was anchored to the rocket’s plastic nose cone (This turned out to be a huge mistake). The shock cord was folded accordion style and taped at each fold, as each taping was broken it would absorb some of the ejection energy. This also helped hold the cord and streamers in place while the whole thing was being crammed into the body.

Externally, I wanted it to look like a stock Estes Sizzler, except perhaps to add lettering that to say "Super Sizzler" or "Sizzler 24mm" or some such thing. But I hadn’t found the lettering I liked, and the paint was barely dry when it was time to pack it for Arizona. In the process of installing the decals, I realized that I made an error on fin sweep when I converted to plywood. (Special thanks to our Dad who did precision work on making those fins, even if I gave him the wrong dimensions)

(10/15/2000)  It was with great trembling that I brought this bird out to the pad. I was sure about the stability, but the recovery frightened me. Would it come down too fast on the streamer, would I be able to find it?
3…2…1..Ignition!! The G55 shot this rocket off of the pad in an instant. Miraculously, Mark caught it coming of the pad sporting a flame at least 20 inches long. It went up waaaay up. Then we held our breath.
The white rocket was hard to see against the clear blue sky, but we caught a glimpse of the orange streamer. Bad news, it was coming down way too slow. Surely the shock cord had separated and only the mount came down with the streamer. Eventually the streamer and motor pod landed over the launch area. As it came down the reflective coating on the booster tube was very apparent and was doing its job. When I recovered it. It was clear that the kevlar ripped through the plastic nose cone, even though I had reinforced it.

But where was the rocket? Dejectedly I went in search of it. I found the impact crater about two hundred yards to the west. The nose cone was buried in the ground and peeled back like Elmer Fudd’s shotgun after Bugs Bunny corks it. The first four inches of the body tube were demolished but the rest of the body and fins were fine. It can be rebuilt!!

And I did, it's called the Fierce Bad Rabbit

 


 
Rate this page

We want your opinion, so make like a Chicago Democrat and vote early, vote often, vote even if you are dead. However, as this is an electronic ballot, West Palm Beach Democrats will need to find a better excuse than hanging or pregnant chads for failing to properly fill out the form.

E-Mail Address: RTV privacy policy
First Name: Last Name: Keep me anonymous
Interesting?
Useful?
Bizzare?
1=Feckless, 5=Benefic 1=Bromidic, 5=Coruscating 1=Quotidian, 5=Pathological




C'mon! Tell us what you really think about this page. We can take it. Really!
(It is only fair to warn you that those who say something truly idiotic may be mocked when Dogbert answers our mail.)

E-Mail Address: RTV privacy policy
First Name: Last Name: Keep me anonymous
Feedback Type



© Copyright 2000-2008, Bradley Vatsaas, Richard Vatsaas, and Mark Vatsaas. All Rights Reserved.